In the case of a publisher/author using false copyright date, how can cataloger be sure about the validity of copyright date?
Of course this always a possibility, But, at the cataloging stage, it is not our responsibility to verify copyright, only to record information we have. RDA does not rule on what to do if we know it is false (probably because in many western countries like the US, copyright is not automatic and must be applied for). So, it is better to record it as copyright information (representing the resource as it represents itself) but then use a note to explain that it's known to be fake. It frequently happens that the copyright status is valid but the date is false. Commercial publishers will often do this when they publish something towards the end of the year. They will often put the following year as the copyright date, to give the content more "currency". Again, if we know the date to be false, we still record it as the copyright date, but then use a note to record actual date.
No comments:
Post a Comment